Legal Opinion

White v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oueiam.

When this appeal was called for hearing in this Court, the defendants demurred ore tenus to the complaint, on the ground that the facts stated therein are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This demurrer is sustained.

It does not appear from the complaint that the negligence of the defendants, as alleged therein,- was the proximate canse of the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The negligent construction or operation of the swing in Independence Park by the defendants furnishes no cause of action on which the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the death of his…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. White v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Barker v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Mabel W. Hitchings v. Albemarle HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  5. Scott v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API