Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Williamson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Bell County Court; J. W. Sutton, Judge. Action by tbe Inner Slioe Tire Company against L. S. Williamson. From a judgment for plaintiff in part, it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.
Appellant sued appellee on an itemized account for merchandise of tbe value of $202.83. Appellee sought to defend against tbe demand on tbe ground that tbe agent of appellant, when be obtained tbe order for the goods, promised that be would return to Temple and sell one-half tbe goods for appéllee, and also falsely represented that tbe inner shoes for automobile tires were absolutely “blow-out proof.” He also sought to recover damages in reconvention in tbe sum of $500. Tbe court rendered judgment in favor of appellant for tbe inner shoes still held by appellee, which had been tendered by tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Bigham v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- McCormick v. KampmannTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Bybee v. Embree-Mclean Carriage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harville Rose Service v. Kellogg CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Ragland v. CURTIS MATHES SALES COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Fritz v. SkilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.