McCormick v. Kampmann
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. The suit was broughf^by H. D. Kampmann, his executrix, Elizabeth D. Kampmann, subsequently becoming a party, against McCormick and others. A recovery by plaintiff was affirmed on appeal by defendants, who thereupon obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gaines
This was a suit by H. D. Kampmann upon eight promissory notes each for $100 payable to Carter & Mullaly, or order, and by them assigned to H. D. Kampmann, and to enforce a lien upon certain personal property which is of the value of more than one thousand dollars. By a supplemental petition Elizabeth D. Kampmann was made party plaintiff, presumably as executrix of the will of H. D. Kampmann, deceased. At all events, the defendants admitted Mrs. Kampmann’s right to recover provided it was not defeated by defenses set up in the answer. The defense was that the notes were given for certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Texas Land & Cattle Co. v. Carroll & IlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- White, Ward & Erwin v. HagerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Bolt v. State Savings Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Bybee v. Embree-Mclean Carriage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.