Legal Opinion

Ragland v. CURTIS MATHES SALES COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1969No. 4853PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

This appeal is by Ragland from a take-nothing judgment against him on his cross-action against appellee Curtis Mathes Sales Company, all other parties and issues having been finally disposed of.

Ragland negotiated for and obtained a distributor franchise from appellee, Curtis Mathes, on behalf of a corporation which he was to form, and did organize, with him self as principal stockholder. The undisputed evidence establishes that a written franchise contract, received in evidence without objection, was executed by this distributor corporation and accepted by ap-pellee.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kingsbery v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Cannon v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boy Scouts of America v. Responsive Terminal Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Baroid Equipment, Inc. v. Odeco Drilling, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. United States v. Vahlco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Harville Rose Service v. Kellogg CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Ed F. Vanston v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API