Legal Opinion

Bigham v. Bigham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1882No. Case No. 3343PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from Bell. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Osterhout. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought by S. W. Bigham against M. S.' Bigham and R. J. Bigham, his wife, upon • a breach of warranty in the sale of land, to recover the purchase money and costs of a suit in which the title of the appellants had been adjudged invalid.

*239At the time of the sale of the land by appellants to appellee, they had an outstanding executory contract to convey the land to one Winnard, who had not made full payment therefor, but-had made valuable improvements thereon, and he, in the suit instituted against him, paid the purchase money and was adjudged title.

There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Faucett v. CurrierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Faucett v. CurrierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. King v. WiseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. A. Landreth Co. v. SchevenelTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. White, Ward & Erwin v. HagerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Burchill v. HermsmeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API