Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1971No. 12065PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs were insureds under an uninsured motorist provision in a policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company. Plaintiffs sustained injuries in an automobile collision with defendant Peterson. They filed a complaint against both Peterson and Allstate; the claim against Peterson sounded in tort; the claim against Allstate arose out of the insurance contract. Allstate filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that there was an improper joinder of parties and a misjoinder of remedies. The trial court granted the motion, and plaintiffs appeal.

On appeal plaintiffs urge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Barnhart v. Civil Service Employees Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Holt v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Young v. BarneyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lima v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. American Concept Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
  3. Kay v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Campbell v. StaggUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Chatterton v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API