Legal Opinion
Zollars v. Barber
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1956No. Civ. 16529PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
In this negligence action the verdict was for defendant and judgment was entered thereon. On plaintiff’s motion a new trial was granted. Defendant appeals from the order granting the new trial and plaintiff cross-appeals from the judgment. We have concluded that the order granting a new trial must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment will then be dismissed as having become moot. (Brignoli v. Seaboard Transp. Co., 29 Cal.2d 782, 792 [178 P.2d 445].)
In the evening of January 17, 1953, plaintiff was injured at the intersection of Princess Street and Bridgeway Boulevard in Sausalito when she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conroy v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Francis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Estate of AdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cole v. RidingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dwelly v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Blankenship v. BrookshierIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Box v. California Date Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Di Muro v. Masterson Trusafe Steel Scaffold Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Morrison v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.