Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Brookshier

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1966No. 9841PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding, commenced by respondent, the natural father of David Laurence Blankenship, a male minor child, 10 years of age, to obtain custody of the child from appellants, the child’s maternal grandparents. At the conclusion of a hearing the trial court entered judgment sustaining and adjudging permanent a writ of habeas corpus theretofore issued and awarded custody of the minor to respondent father.

Appellants have appealed from the judgment. Essentially, their assignments of error question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Jain v. PriestIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Child v. ClouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Unity Light & Power Co. v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API