Legal Opinion
State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 20, 2003No. CO-02-797PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Juan Alexander Coleman challenges his conviction of first-degree driving while impaired, arguing that Minn.Stat. § 169A.03, subd. 21(3) (2000), does not permit use of the 1994 revocation of his driving privileges as an aggravating factor and that use of a 1999 revocation, of which he did not seek judicial review, violated his due-process rights. We affirm.
FACTS
Coleman was stopped for speeding in July 2001. The state trooper who stopped Coleman noticed that he smelled of alcohol and his speech was slurred. An Intoxilyzer test showed that Coleman’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ZeimetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. GoharbawangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Odegard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. OmwegaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.