Legal Opinion

State v. Maas

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 2003No. C3-02-2186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of felony driving while impaired, arguing that a 1994 conviction was not a “prior impaired driving conviction” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 169A.03, subd. 20 (2002). Because the 1994 conviction was within ten years of the conviction being appealed, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Brian Maas was convicted of driving while impaired in 1994, 1998, and 2000. In 2002, he was found driving his boat with an alcohol concentration of 0.19. He was charged with first degree felony driving while impaired because he had three prior convictions within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RetzlaffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API