Odegard v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
In this appeal from the district court’s denial of postconviction relief, appellant argues that his 2003 guilty plea should be vacated or his conviction modified based on the supreme court’s decision in Wiltgen. Because we conclude that Wiltgen does not apply retroactively to convictions that were final when Wiltgen was decided, we affirm.
FACTS
On March 19, 2003, appellant Lance Odegard pleaded guilty to first-degree driving while impaired (DWI), a felony violation of MinmStat. §§ 169A.20, subd. 1(1), 169A.24 (2002). The statutory aggravating factors that elevated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carlos Heard v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019