Legal Opinion

Stansfield v. Mahowsky

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7920SC1055PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether summary judgment for defendant was proper. We are well aware of the many cases which state that only in an exceptional negligence case is summary judgment appropriate, since even where the facts are undisputed it is usually for the jury to apply the standard of the reasonably prudent man. See, e.g., Edwards v. Means, 36 N.C. App. 122, 243 S.E. 2d 161, cert. denied 295 N.C. 260, 245 S.E. 2d 777 (1978). It is also true, however, that summary judgment is proper in a negligence case where the forecast of evidence fails to show negligence on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MeansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Phillips v. Texfi Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southerland v. KappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Frankenmuth Insurance v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Blackmon v. Tri-Arc Food Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Meadows v. Cigar Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Wyrick v. K-MART APPAREL FASHIONS CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API