Legal Opinion

State v. Fults

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2007No. S054609PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this criminal case, the state seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that vacated a sentence and remanded the case for resentencing. The state contends that the claim of error that prompted the Court of Appeals decision was unpreserved and that the Court of Appeals’ determination to consider that claim of error in any event under the doctrine of “plain error” was flawed. For the reasons that follow, we remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration.

The Court of Appeals summarized the relevant facts in its brief opinion as follows:

“In Case Number [04CR1586],…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. UleryOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API