Barber v. Heeden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendants, in their brief, contend (1) that the evidence was insufficient to warrant submission of an issue as to defendants’ alleged actionable negligence, and (2). that plaintiff’s evidence discloses contributory negligence as a matter of law, and therefore the court erred in overruling. their motion made at the conclusion of all the evidence for judgment of nonsuit. However, careful consideration impels the ponclusion that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient to require submission of these issues ,for jury determination. Having reached…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Owens v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Williams v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Graham v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . OvercashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Crow v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McGill v. FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Williams v. BoulericeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Goble v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Kinney v. GoleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Mintz v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.