Legal Opinion

State v. . Overcash

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1946PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The court in its charge clearly defined an assault and instructed the jury:

“It may be a simple assault, as where one man strikes another with his hand, shoves him in anger or hits him with his fist. It may be an assault with intent to commit rape. The element of that offense is, that there must be an assault, and there must be an intent on the part of the assailant to have intercourse with.a female by force and in spite of any resistance she might make.”

It then charged the jury further as follows :

“If a man lays his hands on a ivoman and when he does so he intends to have intercourse with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . MosleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Graham v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Sumner v. . SumnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Barber v. HeedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API