Mintz v. Foster
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s failure to direct a verdict in his favor, contending there was no evidence of actionable negligence. This assignment is overruled. On a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under Rule 50(a), plaintiff’s evidence must be taken as true and must be considered in the light most favorable to him, giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from such evidence. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc., 291 N.C. 666, 231 S.E. 2d 678 (1977). The record reflects ample evidence which would permit the jury to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Clary v. Alexander County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Spruill v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Church v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990