Crow v. Ballard

The plaintiffs’ first assignment of error is to the ruling of .the court below in allowing the motion of defendant Lewis Thamer Ballard for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. .

There is no allégation in the complaints alleging that Lewis Thamer Ballard was the registered owner of .the car involved. Moreover, .the plaintiffs offered no evidence tending to establish ownership of the automobile involved in Lewis Thamer Ballard. Neither did they offer any evidence tending to establish agency under the family purpose doctrine ' or otherwise. Furthermore, no. evidence was…