Legal Opinion

Williams v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Under tbe pleadings and tbe form of tbe issue submitted to tbe jury, tbe burden of proof was on the plaintiff to make out her case. It is conceded that a prima facie right of recovery was established by her evidence. Williamson v. Ins. Co., ante, 377. Tbe duty of meeting tbis prima facie case, in order to avoid hazarding an adverse verdict, was then cast upon tbe defendant. Lyons v. Knights of Pythias, 172 N. C., 408, 90 S. E., 423; Harris v. Junior Order, 168 N. C., 357, 84 S. E., 405; Wilkie v. National Council, 147 N. C., 637, 61 S. E., 580; Doggett v. Golden Gross, 126 N. C., 477, 36 S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Shepard v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API