Legal Opinion

United States v. Kurt Vreeken and Fred R. Vreeken

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1986No. 84-2745, 84-2750PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Fred R. Vreeken and Kurt Vreeken appeal their convictions for aiding in the preparation of false income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), and willful failure to report income in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7206(1) and 7203, Kurt Vreeken contends that the “rule of speciality” contained in the United States-Canada extradition treaty bars his prosecution on the tax offenses charged. Both Vreekens make the following arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of lack of intent; (2) the relevant tax law was so unsettled that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Walt Anthony Sturmoski, A/K/A Anthony W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Pamela Sue Hollis, United States of America v. William T. "Tom" HollisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API