Legal Opinion
United States v. Pamela Sue Hollis, United States of America v. William T. "Tom" Hollis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1992No. 91-6290, 91-6291PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
William “Tom” Hollis and Pamela Sue Hollis were convicted after a jury trial for two counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344; one count of submitting false financial statements to a financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014; two counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; and three counts of engaging in a monetary transaction in interstate commerce in criminally derived proceeds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957(a). 1
Both appeal their convictions on the grounds that: (1) insufficient evidence was established to…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Byron Keith Allen, United States of America v. Ernest Robert ReinhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Salvador Parra, Also Known as Salvador Ledezma, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Sotelo, Also Known as Ricardo DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.