Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William Pilgrim

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1990No. 89-8021, 89-8022PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Arthur Tranakos and William Pilgrim appeal their convictions for conspiring to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and obstructing justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Tranakos also appeals a conviction for preparing and presenting fraudulent tax returns, 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). We affirm.

I

Tranakos and Pilgrim contend that their convictions should be reversed because their statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violated.

On February 24,1983, Tranakos, Pilgrim, Lowell Anderson, Ronald Ellsworth, and others were indicted by a federal grand jury…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. John Wesley Morehead, Sr., John Wesley Morehead, Jr., and Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. John Walter Castro, Sr. v. Ron WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API