Legal Opinion

United States v. Dougherty

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 2015No. Criminal Action Nos. 14-69, 14-435, 14-436, 14-501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE SENTENCING OF DEFENDANTS

BAYLSON, District Judge.

“All punishment is for Example’s Sake” — Francis Bacon1

Deterrence of defendants, and others, is a major goal in the imposition of criminal sentencing; and is, without question, a most important sentencing factor in these cases.

1. Introduction

The defendants’ conduct, arising out of their membership in Ironworkers Local 401, established a culture of crime for many years. Of the twelve individual defendants, eleven have pled guilty to criminal conduct and one, the union leader, Joseph Dougherty, was convicted on six counts after a…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laurel Gardens, LLC, et al. v. Timothy McKenna, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  2. United States v. DoughertyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API