Legal Opinion

United States v. Dougherty

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 2015No. Criminal Action No. 14-69-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.

AND NOW, this _ 16th _ day of July, 2015, after consideration of Defendant Joseph Dougherty’s post-trial Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and/or for a New Trial (ECF 375) and his Reply brief in support of the motion (ECF 525), and after consideration of the Government’s Response and Sur-Reply briefs (ECF 350, 515, and 529), and after consideration of both parties’ arguments at trial, it is hereby ORDERED that Dougherty’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and/or for a New Trial (ECF 375) is DENIED.

MEMORANDUM RE: POST-TRIAL MOTION

Who finds the heifer dead…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Warren Brown, A/K/A Prince AsielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. David CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API