Legal Opinion

Laurel Gardens, LLC, et al. v. Timothy McKenna, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2026No. 5:17-cv-00570Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAUREL GARDENS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-00570-JLS TIMOTHY MCKENNA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION SCHMEHL, J. /s/ JLS MARCH 30, 2026 When a defendant infiltrates an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, acquires control of that enterprise, and then uses that control to injure the enterprise, that enterprise may have a colorable claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b). But not every pattern of racketeering creates control, and not every exercise of control produces injury.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API