Legal Opinion

Rice v. Chrysler Motors Corporation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1972No. 8808PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Rudolph S. Rice (hereinafter Rice), has appealed from two summary judgments entered in favor of the respective defendants, Chrysler Motors Corporation (hereinafter Chrysler) and Valley Motors Company (hereinafter Valley), whereby the plaintiff’s complaint against the defendants in an action brought against them jointly for damages for breach of warranty, or in the alternative for a rescission, was dismissed.

On October 17, 1968, Rice purchased from Valley a new 1969 model Imperial Le-Baron 4-door hardtop Chrysler automobile equipped with a number of extras,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Robert C. Stubbs and Mary Ann Stubbs, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Lujan v. MacMurtrieArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wolff v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Farmers Elevator Company v. DavidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kure v. Chevrolet Motor DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sagmiller v. CarlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Stutts v. Green Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Boone v. Estate of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API