Legal Opinion

Kure v. Chevrolet Motor Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1978No. 4859PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

This appeal, pursued by plaintiff-appellant, arises from entry of judgment by the district court in favor of all defendants, save one, at the close of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff asserts the judgment in favor of defendants, Chevrolet Motor Division and Tyrrell Chevrolet, was error and that the damages awarded against defendant J. A. Chevrolet were insufficient. We shall reverse the district court judgment as to the action against Chevrolet Motor Division and J. A. Chevrolet and otherwise affirm.

On March 1, 1975, plaintiff took delivery of a 1975 Chevrolet Corvette from Whisler…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gino's Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Zimmerman v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City, S.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Amfac Mechanical Supply Co. v. FedererWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API