Legal Opinion

Sagmiller v. Carlsen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1974No. Civ. 8905PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Morton County District Court, Sixth Judicial District, entered on March 8, 1973, which granted a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, N.D.R.Civ.P., and dismissed a medical malpractice action because of plaintiff’s failure to show by affidavit or otherwise that she had expert medical testimony to establish the standard of medical care in the area and the failure of the defendant doctor to meet that standard, and that such failure was the proximate cause of her alleged injury.

Our statement of the facts is based upon the record…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Sheets v. Letnes, Marshall & Fiedler, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API