Legal Opinion
Gargoyles, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 15, 1999No. 342-88CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This patent action is before the Court on several issues: (1) plaintiffs’ and defendant’s respective supplemental briefs regarding whether the recently amended statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1498, (“Section 1498”), applies to plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees resulting from its long-standing patent infringement litigation; (2) defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and, assuming the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion with regard to the applicability of Section 1498 and denies defendant’s motion to dismiss, (3)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Eric David Boudette v. John Barnette, Police Officer James Vaughn, Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Manno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Holloway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.