Legal Opinion
Manno v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 30, 2001No. 99-285CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs Application for Attorneys’ Fees after trial and entry of judgment in plaintiffs favor. Plaintiff argues that the position of the United States Department of Agriculture, by the Natural Resources Conservation Service Agency (the “NRCS” or the “agency”), both before and during litigation was not “substantially justified” within the meaning of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412 (West 1994 & Supp.1999) (the “EAJA”). Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The NRCS awarded James J. Manno, Sr., d/b/a James J. Manno…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Stephen L. Helfer, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Tgs International, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.