Legal Opinion
Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 29, 2002No. 98-326CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs application for attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the *80“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1994 & Supp. V 1999). Among the issues to be decided are whether and to what extent plaintiffs failure to succeed on certain damage claims affects it recovery. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
Baldi Bros. Constructors (“plaintiff’) successfully bid on Contract No. N62470-95-C-5035, offered by the United States Department of the Navy (the “Navy”) for the construction of a training range in North Carolina. Baldi Bros.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Fanning, Phillips and Molnar v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Dewey v. Volkswagen of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.