Legal Opinion
CEMS, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 22, 2005No. Nos. 99-951C, 00-437C to 00-439CPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the application of CEMS, Inc. for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2000). Plaintiff alleges that it is entitled to an award of attorney fees and expenses under EAJA. More specifically, plaintiff argues that (1) the contracting officer assigned to this case at the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHA), Western Federal Lands Highway Division “surrendered his or her authority to make decisions” during the administration of the contract; (2) that the contracting…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Loomis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.