Legal Opinion

Schatzberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2012No. Civil Action. No. 10-2900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Peter Schatzberg, D.C., and his medical practice, Philadelphia Pain Management, Inc., bring a six count Amended Complaint against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (collectively “State Farm”) alleging that State Farm is attempting to eliminate his medical practice by (1) falsely accusing him of having engaged in fraudulent business activity, (2) creating the false perception in the community that he has engaged in professional impropriety, and (3) engaging in a pattern of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. National Freight, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. AVRAHAM v. GOLDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  3. BROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. SIMMONS v. GILMOREDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. v. HARTLEIBDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API