Legal Opinion

THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. v. HARTLEIB

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2023No. 2:19-cv-02728Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C., et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 2:19-cv-02728-KSM v. MICHAEL HARTLEIB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. March 29, 2023 This case spawns from a years-long dispute between Plaintiffs, the Weiser Law Firm, P.C. (the “Law Firm”) and Robert Weiser, Esquire, and Defendant Michael Hartleib. Plaintiffs assert claims for defamation, commercial disparagement, and false light invasion of privacy. Presently before the Court is Hartleib’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 193.) For the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API