Legal Opinion

Budris v. Allstate Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 31, 1996No. 15246PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court’s action in granting summary judgment was improper because it incorrectly determined that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery under an *54insurance policy provision that barred recovery for injuries sustained while in an uninsured vehicle owned by the insured. He posits that the trial court’s determination, made as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was the owner of the truck in which he was injured was improper. We reverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hope v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Warren v. BorawskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Brown v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  4. Cook v. NyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Burakowski v. GrustasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southbridge Associates, LLC v. GarofaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Mullen v. HortonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. NantesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Solomon v. GilmoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Passini v. Town of WinchesterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API