Legal Opinion
Warren v. Borawski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 6, 1944PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Section 14 of the zoning ordinances of the city of New Britain, printed in the footnote, 1 provides for a three-fourths vote of the common council under the circumstances therein described and the question to be determined is whether those circumstances existed in this case.
On the 16th day of July, 1941, a petition was introduced into the common council for an extension of the present business “A” zone on both -sides of Burritt Street. ' It was referred to the board of adjustment. The board, with at least five members voting favorably, as required by the ordinance, voted to deny the petition…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mulligan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- O'Connor v. ChiascioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Camp v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Ahern v. Board of Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Marcus v. Board of Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Smith v. Planning & Zoning Board of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- General Realty Improvement Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Hope v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Leary v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Bauer v. PoundsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.