Legal Opinion
Southbridge Associates, LLC v. Garofalo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 1999No. AC 18248PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KULAWIZ, J.
The defendants Albert A. Garofalo and Pequot Motor Inn, Inc. (Pequot), appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff following that court’s granting of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.1 The defendants claim that the trial court *13improperly (1) granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (2) denied the defendants’ motion for an order of compliance with discovery requests and (3) granted the plaintiffs motion for a judgment of foreclosure. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On July 18, 1986, Garofalo borrowed $3,000,000 from Connecticut…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- New Haven Savings Bank v. LaPlaceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.