Legal Opinion

Brown v. New Haven Taxicab Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Action to recover damages for injuries to the plaintiff and to his automobile, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant’s servant, brought to the City Court of New Haven and tried to the jury before Booth, J.; the court directed a verdict for the defendant, but subsequently, upon motion of the plaintiff, set aside the verdict so rendered and granted a new trial, and from this decision the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

At the close of the evidence in this case the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict upon the ground that the automobile which the plaintiff alleged and claimed to own was not properly registered as required by the provisions of § 19 of the Motor Vehicle Law (Public Acts of 1915, Chap. 231), the material portion of which is as follows: “No recovery shall be had in the courts of this State, by the oymer or operator, or any passenger of a motor vehicle which has not been legally registered in accordance with section two or three of this act, for injury to person or property received by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Camp v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Whitfield v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. SladeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API