Legal Opinion

Contract Management, Inc. v. Rumsfeld

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided November 24, 2003No. CIV.03-00232 HG-LEKPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GILLMOR, District Judge.

The instant case involves a dispute surrounding the Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) interpretation of the HUBZone Program, set forth in the Small Business Act, at 15 U.S.C. § 657a, and the corresponding federal regulations. See generally 13 C.F.R. § 126.607; 48 C.F.R. § 19.1305. Plaintiff contends that § 657a does not authorize or require the designation of contracts to be limited to bidding by qualified HUBZone businesses and that the HUBZone regulations,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Blue Dot Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Contract Management, Inc. v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API