Legal Opinion
DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 15, 2011No. 10-396CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff, DGR Associates, Inc. (DGR), seeks $37,402.72 in attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses from Defendant pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2006). DGR prevailed in its bid protest against the United States Air Force, showing that, in a procurement for housing maintenance, inspection, and repair services at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, the Air Force violated the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 657a(b)(2)(B) (2006), by not giving a priority to HUBZone small business concerns. The Court issued an injunction requiring…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Baker v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Whr Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- 2m Research Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.