DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a dispute over whether a party who prevailed in a bid protest against the United States is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Court of Federal Claims determined that the Government’s position in the underlying bid protest was not substantially justified, and awarded attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. 1 However, given the then-existing disagreement among all three branches of the Federal Government over the law applicable to this bid protest, we conclude that the Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Synergy Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Kwr Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Whr Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Phoenix Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Red River Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.