Legal Opinion

DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 2, 2012No. 2011-5080PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a dispute over whether a party who prevailed in a bid protest against the United States is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Court of Federal Claims determined that the Government’s position in the underlying bid protest was not substantially justified, and awarded attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. 1 However, given the then-existing disagreement among all three branches of the Federal Government over the law applicable to this bid protest, we conclude that the Court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Synergy Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Kwr Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Whr Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Phoenix Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Red River Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API