Legal Opinion

S. S. Sarna, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 2, 1960No. 64135; protests 278594-K, 278595-K, 285358-K, and 289426-K (New York)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These protests have been limited to four items, identified herein as follows:

Entry No. Item Invoice description Exhibit No.

12364 M-78 Large Door knocker Colored_1

12364 230-A Bell Bottle Openers Eng-2

77366 59805 218-N 181 Candle holders Nokdar-3 brass bell brackets elephant design_4

In classifying the bottle opener (plaintiff’s exhibit 2) and the candleholder (plaintiff’s exhibit 3), the collector regarded each of those items as consisting *445of two separate entities, i.e., a household utensil composed of brass, dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Karavan Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wing On Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. S. S. Sarna, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API