Legal Opinion
Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 30, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-2859(JBS)PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
The National Flood Insurance Program uses private insurers acting as fiscal agents of the United States Treasury to adjust and pay flood insurance claims for covered losses. The defendant in this case, Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“Omaha” or “Defendant”), is such a private insurer and issued a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) to plaintiffs Joseph L. Messa, Jr., and John and Carol McDonald (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs are citizens and residents of Pennsylvania and co-own a condominium unit located at 47 West 18th Street in Ocean City, New…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Jamal v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Ambassador Beach Condominium Ass'n v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
- Diaz v. BullockDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
- Mance v. Quest Diagnostics Inc. Voluntary Separation Agreement PlanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.