Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Bullock
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 13-5192PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J.
This matter concerns the arrest of the wrong person, Plaintiff, by New Jersey *644police officers in response to. an outstanding Maryland warrant. This Opinion addresses motions for summary judgment filed by (1) South Plainfield Police Officer Mark Bullock and Lieutenant Peter Aran-do (the “Officer Defendants”) (D.E. 88); (2) the Borough of South Plainfield and the South Plainfield Police Department (the “South Plainfield Defendants”) (D.E. 89); and (3) the County of Middlesex and Mid-dlesex County Office of Adult Corrections and Youth Services (the “Middlesex…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HARLEY v. CITY OF WOODBURYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. M AMIR C, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Tobal v. Virgin Islands Police DepartmentDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
- Waters v. State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020