Legal Opinion

Ambassador Beach Condominium Ass'n v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided January 24, 2001No. 5:99cv6-SPMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MICKLE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 22) filed by Defendant Omaha Property and Casualty Insurance Company. The parties have had the opportunity to fully brief the issues and to submit materials in accordance with Northern District of Florida Local Rules 56 and 7.1. For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The motion for summary judgment will therefore be granted.

I. Background

Plaintiff Ambassador Beach Condominium Association, Inc.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tipton v. Bergrohr GMBH-SiegenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  4. John R. Downs v. Hawkeye Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Dogwood Grocery, Inc. v. South Carolina InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eaker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
  2. Slater v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the MidwestDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  3. Howell v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  4. Petersen v. National Flood Insurance ProgramDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Clement v. Colonial ClaimsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API