Legal Opinion
Ault v. Dinner for Two, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1972No. Civ. 11225PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AULT, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Jeffrey Ault, * appeals from an order quashing service of summons made on a foreign corporation by serving the corporation’s managing agent at the corporation’s office in New Jersey.
The question presented is whether the trial court erred in determining there was no basis for jurisdiction over the defendant foreign corporation. We conclude the statutory requirements for service of process were met, the constitutional basis for jurisdiction existed, and that the trial court erred in granting the motion to quash service of summons.
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Martino v. Concord Community Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- MJS Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.