Legal Opinion
MJS Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1984No. F003527PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing respondent court to grant their motion to set aside a default judgment entered against them in a civil action and motion to quash service of process in that action.
Facts
Petitioner MJS Enterprises, Inc. (defendant) is a named defendant in a civil action; real parties (plaintiffs) are the plaintiffs in that action.
On August 8, 1983, summons in the action was personally served upon petitioner Michael Saporetti; the proof of service indicates that Saporetti was served on behalf of defendant. However, the summons so served contains a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lyman v. MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Greene v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ault v. Dinner for Two, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Matthews Metals Products, Inc. v. RBM Precision Metal Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ikerd v. Warren T. Merrill & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- West Suburban Bank v. Advantage Financial Partners, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.