Legal Opinion

M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1978No. Civ. 16405PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

The parties are before us on a writ of mandate and/or prohibition. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., the petitioner, seeks to overturn a procedural determination by the trial court. The court’s order had denied petitioner’s motion to quash service and alternatively to dismiss the complaint.

Three basic issues are raised; First, may petitioner (a defendant) be served by mail outside the state when it, a foreign corporation, has designated an agent to receive personal service within the state? Second, if so, is the California statutory scheme unconstitutional which permits service by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Johnson & Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API