M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
The parties are before us on a writ of mandate and/or prohibition. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., the petitioner, seeks to overturn a procedural determination by the trial court. The court’s order had denied petitioner’s motion to quash service and alternatively to dismiss the complaint.
Three basic issues are raised; First, may petitioner (a defendant) be served by mail outside the state when it, a foreign corporation, has designated an agent to receive personal service within the state? Second, if so, is the California statutory scheme unconstitutional which permits service by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Johnson & Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.