Legal Opinion

MacKler v. Lahman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1943No. 14600PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

There is no attack on the bona fides of the transaction of May 11, 1940, under which Willner and Mackler, having settled their differences growing out of the litigation over the first security deed, entered into a new contract. Hnder the terms of that contract, Willner executed a second deed to secure not only a pre-existing indebtedness of $1650, but also to secure a present advancement of $3000 to him by Mackler. In this instrument it .was provided, that from time to time other and further accounts receivable and other personal property, at the option of Madder, might be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Huey v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Mutual Loan & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Edwards v. United Food Brokers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Evans Motors of Georgia Inc. v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Henderson v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API