Federal Land Bank v. Bank of Lenox
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
As to the motion to dismiss the writ of error, the Code, § 6-901, requires that a bill of exceptions “shall specify plainly the decision complained of and the alleged error.” The instant case does not fall within the rule in Greenfield v. Har vey, 191 Ga. 92 (11 S. E. 2d, 776), where it was held that a mere “statement in a bill of exceptions, that 'plaintiff excepts to said verdict and judgment as being contrary to law’ is not a valid assignment of error, and will not be considered by this court;” and that “by analogy this rule applies in a case where there is no verdict, but…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Scott v. PaisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hargroves v. CookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Citizens Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- MacKler v. LahmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Roylston v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Title Insurance Corp. of St. Louis v. United StatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Tampa Investment Group, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Aure v. MacKoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.