Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
The clause of the policy under which liability is claimed expressly requires that the boat upon which the insured was traveling must have been a passenger steamship, and that the insured must have been traveling thereon either as a fare-paying passenger or a passenger riding on a pass. Since this is a case involving insurance policies, we must and do give full consideration to the rule of law that requires that all ambiguities be construed most favorably to the insured. Sovereign Camp W.O.W. v. Heflin, 188 Ga. 234 (3 S. E. 2d, 559); Aschenbrenner v. U. S. Fidelity &c.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- MacKler v. LahmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. Calvin T. Rutland, Doing Business as Rutland Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Chalverus v. Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Washburn Storage Co. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.